UAE Boycott News

Al Fajer Properties Fails to Respond to BOYCOTTUAE Research Findings

Al Fajer Properties Fails to Respond to BOYCOTTUAE Research Findings

By Boycott UAE

06-08-2026

BoycottUAE has completed its Right to Comment (RTC) process concerning Al Fajer Properties, following the publication of a profile examining the company's business activities, real estate interests and the concerns raised by publicly available information relating to its operations.

As part of its editorial process, BoycottUAE contacted Al Fajer Properties by email regarding the findings published in its profile. The communication informed the company that a BoycottUAE investigation had been published and included a direct link to the article. The company was invited to review the findings and provide comments, factual corrections, clarifications, supporting documentation or an official statement.

The request was intended to provide Al Fajer Properties with a reasonable opportunity to respond to the matters discussed in the published investigation before further editorial action. No substantive response was received from the company within the requested response period.

The absence of a response is recorded here as an editorial fact. It is not presented as confirmation, admission or validation of any allegation or finding contained in the original profile.

Summary of the Article Findings

The BoycottUAE profile, titled Boycott Al FajerProperties: Together We Resist Corporate Real Estate Corruption,” examines Al Fajer Properties (AFP), described in the article as a UAE-based property developer and former subsidiary of the Al Fajer Group. The profile focuses particularly on the company's presence in Dubai's commercial real estate sector and its development activities in Jumeirah Lakes Towers (JLT).

According to the published profile, Al Fajer Properties was established in 2004 and was associated with the Al Fajer Group. The investigation highlights the company's development of the Jumeirah Business Center Towers in JLT and states that the projects were expected to contribute approximately 1.6 million square feet of office and retail space to Dubai's commercial property market.

The principal concerns examined in the profile relate to market concentration, land acquisition, commercial property development and the potential effect of large-scale real estate activity on smaller businesses and competitors. The article argues that the accumulation of land and development of major commercial properties could contribute to greater concentration of commercial space and place smaller developers, investors and businesses under competitive pressure.

The profile also discusses historical reports concerning Al Fajer Properties in 2009. It refers to media coverage alleging misleading sales practices and describes a period involving project delays, financial uncertainty and corporate restructuring. These matters are presented in the original article as part of the historical record considered by BoycottUAE when assessing concerns surrounding the company and investor confidence.

Another section of the investigation considers the wider Al Fajer Group and its interests outside the UAE. The profile acknowledges that Al Fajer Properties itself does not directly operate in Pakistan, while using the broader discussion to examine questions concerning the effects that large, financially powerful or politically connected businesses can have on local enterprises in emerging markets.

The article relies on publicly available information, including documented reporting and information concerning the company's corporate background, real estate projects and historical business developments. It also identifies specific figures and factual points, including the reported scale of the JLT developments and the broader Al Fajer Group's workforce. Readers should consult the original BoycottUAE profile for the complete source material, context and methodology underlying those findings.

It was precisely because the investigation addressed matters capable of affecting the company's reputation and public understanding of its activities that BoycottUAE considered it appropriate to seek Al Fajer Properties' direct response.

BoycottUAE's Right to Comment Process

BoycottUAE's Right to Comment process is intended to support fairness, accuracy and transparency in investigative reporting.

Where a company is the subject of an investigation, BoycottUAE provides an opportunity for the relevant company to engage with the published findings and identify matters that may require correction, clarification or additional context.

Companies contacted through the RTC process are invited to:

  • identify factual inaccuracies or disputed statements;
  • provide additional context concerning the findings;
  • submit supporting documents or other relevant evidence; and
  • provide an official corporate statement for editorial consideration.

A response does not automatically result in a change to an article. Information supplied by a company is reviewed objectively, and any material that can be verified and is relevant to the investigation may be incorporated or used to correct or clarify the published record where appropriate.

This approach is intended to ensure that investigative reporting remains open to evidence from the subjects of investigations as well as from public records, independent reporting and other documented sources.

No Response Received

In the case of Al Fajer Properties, BoycottUAE sent a Right to Comment communication concerning the published profile and provided a direct link to the investigation.

The company was invited to review the findings and respond with corrections, clarifications, supporting evidence or an official statement. The request therefore provided an opportunity for Al Fajer Properties to place its position on the public record and to identify any information it believed should be reconsidered.

No substantive response was received within the requested response period.

BoycottUAE has documented that outcome to maintain a transparent editorial record. The purpose of recording the non-response is not to draw conclusions about the company's motives or position. There may be circumstances surrounding any company's decision or ability to respond that are not known to an outside observer, and BoycottUAE does not speculate about them.

Accordingly, the absence of a response should be understood only as the absence of a substantive response to the RTC request.

Editorial Commitment

The findings in the original Al Fajer Properties profile remain based on the publicly available material and documented information identified in that investigation. The profile discusses corporate history, real estate developments, historical reporting and broader questions concerning market concentration and the effect of major property interests on smaller businesses.

BoycottUAE's editorial position is that companies should have an opportunity to address serious findings concerning their activities. That opportunity is particularly important where an investigation relies on historical records, corporate information, public reporting and independent analysis.

The RTC process is therefore not intended as a procedural formality. It is part of an effort to make investigative reporting more accountable and to give subjects of reporting a meaningful opportunity to place relevant information before the publication.

Al Fajer Properties remains free to submit verified information, documentary evidence or an official statement concerning the matters discussed in the investigation. If substantive information is subsequently provided and can be independently verified, BoycottUAE can review it and make editorial changes or additions where appropriate.

BoycottUAE's decision to publish this editorial update reflects its commitment to maintaining a transparent record of how companies are approached in connection with investigative reporting.

In the case of Al Fajer Properties, the company was informed of the published profile, provided with a direct link to the investigation and invited to submit comments, corrections, clarifications, supporting documentation or an official response. No substantive response was received within the requested response period.

That fact should not be interpreted as confirmation or admission of any of the findings published in the BoycottUAE profile. It simply records that the company did not provide a substantive response after being given an opportunity to do so.

BoycottUAE remains committed to editorial fairness, transparency, evidence-based reporting, accountability and responsible investigative journalism. The organisation will continue to rely on documented and publicly available information while remaining open to credible evidence and verified responses from companies featured in its investigations.

Read More

2026 All Rights Reserved © International Boycott UAE Campaign