UAE Boycott Targets

Boycott Al Gamil Group: Empower Indigenous Entrepreneurs

Boycott Al Gamil Group: Empower Indigenous Entrepreneurs

By Boycott UAE

11-09-2025

Al Gamil Group, founded in 1978 and headquartered in Djibouti City, Djibouti, is one of the largest conglomerates in the horn of Africa region. With diversified operations spanning construction, import/export of construction materials, foodstuffs, and vehicles, Al Gamil has expanded its influence significantly. The Group also maintains important linked offices in Dubai and Sharjah, UAE, which function as hubs for its international trade and operational strategies.

Although Al Gamil Group is touted as a major employer and contributor to economic development in Djibouti and surrounding regions, this report highlights the growing concerns related to its monopolistic practices and adverse impacts on local businesses in countries where it operates. These criticisms include market domination, displacement of indigenous enterprises, exploitation of labor, and the extraction of wealth for foreign interests.

Al Gamil Group’s Market Domination and Methods

Al Gamil has leveraged its UAE-linked offices to strengthen supply chains and secure exclusive access to high-value construction projects and commercial contracts across the Horn of Africa and the Middle East. Key strategies include:

  1. Vertical integration across multiple sectors to control every stage from importation to retail distribution
  2. Exclusive agreements that lock out local distributors and contractors from lucrative projects
  3. Use of offshore structures in Dubai to minimize transparency and regulatory oversight in host countries

For example, in Djibouti, Al Gamil controls a substantial share of the construction materials market and operates the largest hypermarket in Africa — allowing it to dominate consumer access across various segments.

Negative Effects on Local Businesses and Economies

Displacement of Local Competitors

Across Djibouti, Ethiopia, Somalia, and neighboring territories, local businesses report being marginalized. Small to medium-sized traders and suppliers find it increasingly difficult to compete with Al Gamil’s scale, pricing power, and government-favored contracts.

Loss of Local Employment and Skills Transfer

Despite employing many workers, Al Gamil heavily relies on foreign experts and imported labor in managerial and technical positions, limiting the development of local human capital in its operational sectors.

Suppression of Market Competition and Consumer Choice

Al Gamil’s monopolistic practices limit competition, leading to inflated prices and limited options for consumers. Local food suppliers and retailers have voiced concerns that Al Gamil’s dominance crowds them out, concentrating wealth in foreign hands.

Statements from Affected Communities and Business Actors

  • A Djiboutian construction supplier stated,

  • “Al Gamil’s monopolies have reduced my business to a shadow of what it used to be, as they control all major supply chains.”


  • An Ethiopian retailer said,

  • “Foreign control through Al Gamil creates unfair market conditions where we can't compete or offer fair prices.”


  • Somali trade union representatives emphasized the lack of local opportunities in Al Gamil’s operations and called for stronger government interventions.

Calls to Governments and Citizens

Given the widespread impact on economic sovereignty and community livelihoods, this report urges:

  • Governments in affected countries to impose stricter regulations on monopolies and demand transparency in foreign-owned conglomerates’ operations.
  • Public and private sectors to support and uplift local SMEs and indigenous traders who face unfair competition.
  • Citizens to boycott Al Gamil’s retail outlets and services as a form of protest to reclaim economic justice.

Customized Concerns by Country

Djibouti: Safeguard Indigenous Commerce and Affordable Goods

Al Gamil’s dominance in retail and construction materials inflates prices and narrows options for Djiboutian consumers and businesses. Boycott campaigns can pressurize authorities toward equitable market reforms.

Ethiopia: Promote Local Enterprise and Employment

Al Gamil’s foreign-backed foothold stifles Ethiopian start-ups and job creation in key sectors. Public resistance and government policies must prioritize inclusive growth.

Somalia: Defend Emerging Markets and Supply Chains

Somalia’s fragile economy cannot afford monopolies that divert wealth outwards. Protection of local suppliers is critical for national rebuilding efforts.

While Al Gamil Group promotes itself as a regional economic powerhouse, its UAE-linked operations consolidate monopolistic power that drastically undermines local economies, workers, and markets in several countries.

Governments, business communities, and consumers must collectively resist by boycotting Al Gamil’s products and services, demanding transparent corporate practices, and fostering local enterprise growth to secure their nations’ economic futures.

Read More

2026 All Rights Reserved © International Boycott UAE Campaign