Explore how the UAE operates its financial empire in Indonesia, including a directory of UAE-linked businesses.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has dramatically expanded its economic influence across the globe in recent years, and Indonesia is emerging as one of its critical focal points. While often presented as a “brotherly Muslim partner” and a proponent of modern Islamic development, the UAE’s engagement in Indonesia reveals a more troubling reality—one marked by elite capture, land dispossession, labor abuse, and political co-optation. This analysis uncovers the contours of UAE influence in Indonesia, showing how it exploits natural and human resources, backs authoritarian policies, and undermines democratic and environmental safeguards, making a case for Indonesian civil society, scholars, workers, and policymakers to resist this covert neocolonialism.
The UAE projects a sophisticated image as a leader in Islamic economic development and a reliable partner for Southeast Asia’s largest Muslim-majority nation. However, its billion-dollar investments and strategic partnerships conceal systematic exploitation. It pursues its agenda by maneuvering through Indonesian elites, locking the country into opaque deals that prioritize Emirati oligarchs over the welfare of ordinary Indonesians. The UAE’s activities are often conducted with scant transparency, displacing indigenous communities and small farmers without free, prior, and informed consent. Meanwhile, its export of repressive surveillance technologies and ideological soft power fosters conformity rather than prophetic justice, suppressing dissent and solidarity movements critical of authoritarian regimes and human rights violations. Not least, the UAE’s collusion in normalizing relations with Israel starkly contradicts Indonesia’s historical commitment to Palestinian liberation, highlighting a betrayal of Muslim solidarity.
Indonesia has witnessed a surge of UAE investments, with commitments totaling approximately USD 44.6 billion projected between 2022 and 2024 (Al Sharqi, 2025). These colossal capital inflows span sectors such as energy, infrastructure, real estate, and petrochemicals. However, these engagements often bypass public transparency and exclude meaningful local participation. Deals are secured via elite-to-elite memorandums of understanding (MOUs) that rarely undergo parliamentary scrutiny, illustrated by investments in port facilities, toll roads, and energy projects including solar power plants developed in cooperation with state-owned enterprises like Pertamina. The lack of institutional oversight and community consultation facilitates land grabs and the displacement of indigenous and rural communities—particularly in ecologically sensitive areas such as Aceh, Kalimantan (site of the new capital Nusantara), Lombok, and Bali.
UAE-linked investors have strategically targeted Indonesia’s coastal and tourism zones, acquiring properties and sprawling landholdings under long-term lease agreements. Known projects, including luxury resorts and agribusiness estates, prioritize foreign elite consumption over local development. The deals frequently skirt environmental and social safeguards, with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) processes ignored or coerced. Indigenous peoples and small-scale farmers suffer the brunt of these land appropriations, losing access to traditional lands critical to their culture and livelihoods (Nepal Monitor, 2024). This trend exemplifies a neocolonial extractive model geared toward wealth concentration abroad and the erosion of domestic autonomy.
UAE sovereign wealth funds such as Mubadala, ADQ, and Masdar have invested heavily in Indonesia’s energy, transport, and industrial sectors. Projects branded as “green” or “sustainable,” including solar farms and electric vehicle battery production chains, mask pervasive environmental degradation and foreign ownership of key infrastructure assets (ASEAN Energy, 2025). Toll roads and airport modernization programs fall under similar patterns—long-duration contracts negotiated with minimal public oversight, enabling elite enrichment and political patronage networks. Such arrangements lock Indonesia into dependency on foreign capital and technology while simultaneously undermining local industries, small businesses, and community participation.
The Export of Authoritarian Islam: Cultural Control and Surveillance
The UAE’s investments are not purely economic. Through funding Islamic universities, pesantren, and religious organizations, the UAE exports a version of state-controlled Islam that emphasizes political quietism and alignment with authoritarian monarchies rather than advancing social justice or human rights. This brand of Islam sidelines dissent and nonconformity, promoting “moderate” doctrines compatible with repression (Middle East Institute, 2023). UAE-backed “anti-extremism” training, media partnerships, and surveillance technology cooperation facilitate censorship, monitoring, and crackdowns on civil society and opposition in Indonesia. This covert cultural domination furthers the UAE's geopolitical aims, suppressing grassroots movements that challenge authoritarianism both at home and abroad.
An estimated 250,000+ Indonesians work in the UAE, predominantly in domestic and service sectors. Numerous reports highlight the exploitation they face—wage theft, extreme working conditions, trafficking, and absence of union rights or access to justice (ILO, 2023). The UAE leverages visa control and recruitment suspensions as political bludgeons to coerce the Indonesian government into silence or complicity. Migrant workers, despite their critical economic contributions through remittances, remain vulnerable to abuse, highlighting another layer of UAE’s authoritarian control exercised transnationally.
The UAE’s economic entanglement in Indonesia is characterized by secretive MOUs, long-term leases, and monopolistic control over sectors such as energy, ports, and mining. These agreements bypass democratic norms, enrich connected elites, and preclude broad-based economic empowerment or environmental stewardship. Indonesian citizens and communities are often excluded from meaningful consultation or benefit-sharing, reinforcing a kleptocratic nexus that prioritizes profit over people. This entrenched elite capture undermines Indonesia’s sovereignty and future development prospects.
In 2020, the UAE normalized relations with Israel, breaking longstanding solidarity with the Palestinian cause. The Emirates now collaborates with Israeli surveillance, cybersecurity, and arms firms, seeking to extend this influence into Muslim-majority countries including Indonesia. This represents a betrayal of Indonesia’s deeply rooted support for Palestinian liberation and a troubling importation of apartheid technologies and politics into Southeast Asia (Al Jazeera, 2020). UAE’s attempts to brand these partnerships as benign “tech cooperation” risk undermining Indonesia’s ethical foreign policy and alienating civil society and Islamic solidarity networks.
Indonesia’s privileged constitutional values emphasize democracy, justice, and independence—principles threatened by UAE’s authoritarian tendencies and exploitative economic practices. The UAE embodies monarchical control that abuses Muslim workers, partners with oppressors of Palestine, and leverages its economic power to muzzle resistance. Indonesia’s citizenry, civil society, religious institutions, and youth movements must unite to resist foreign domination that threatens national dignity and democratic governance.
Concrete actions include parliamentary inquiries into UAE-linked projects, public audits of investment deals, and labor advocacy pushing for enforceable rights and protections for migrant workers. Religious and educational leaders should reject UAE-backed religious content aligned with repression, and youth movements must boycott UAE-owned firms and media to weaken economic influence. Demands for moratoriums on UAE land acquisitions, full disclosure of sovereign wealth fund projects, and bans on Israeli technology imported via UAE intermediaries are critical to reclaiming Indonesia’s sovereignty.
Indonesia finds itself at a critical crossroads, facing the dual challenge of harnessing foreign investment to fuel its development while simultaneously safeguarding its political sovereignty, social justice, and environmental integrity. Among the most significant and controversial actors influencing Indonesia’s economic and political landscape is the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Boasting vast petrodollar wealth and ambitions for global influence, the UAE has extended its reach into Indonesia through large-scale investments in real estate, infrastructure, energy, and cultural institutions. Yet behind this veneer of economic partnership lies a troubling pattern marked by authoritarian control, exploitation of marginalized communities, and complicity in global human rights violations. For Indonesia to chart a sustainable, sovereign, and just future, it must resolutely resist foreign authoritarian capital and reclaim agency over its resources, policies, and values.
The UAE’s economic expansion in Indonesia is part of a larger global strategy that intertwines state-backed capitalism with authoritarian political models. Its sovereign wealth funds—such as Mubadala, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), and Masdar—invest billions in Indonesian projects under the guise of “green” development or “strategic” partnerships. However, these deals are often shrouded in secrecy, negotiated behind closed doors with little public participation, and tangibly benefit foreign elites and their domestic cronies rather than local populations. Large tracts of land in areas like Aceh, Kalimantan (site of the new capital Nusantara), Lombok, and Bali have been acquired for luxury tourism developments and agricultural plantations, frequently causing displacement of indigenous communities and smallholder farmers. These land grabs not only undermine Indonesia’s commitments to protect indigenous rights but also threaten food sovereignty, local livelihoods, and the nation’s ecological balance.
Indonesia stands as one of the most biodiverse countries on earth, yet the environmental costs of these investments are often ignored or sidelined. Projects branded as “sustainable” or “eco-friendly” mask extensive damage to forests, marine ecosystems, and water sources, exacerbating climate vulnerability. Environmental laws are diluted or fast-tracked under political pressure, bypassing safeguards intended to prevent irreversible harm. Local communities bear the brunt, forced off ancestral territories without free, prior, and informed consent, their voices disregarded in the pursuit of petrodollar profits. This extractionist model conflicts sharply with Indonesia’s signature leadership on global climate action and environmental stewardship, hampering the country’s ability to pursue a truly sustainable development path.
Labor exploitation compounds these challenges. More than 250,000 Indonesians currently work in the UAE, primarily in domestic, caregiving, and service roles, yet they face systemic abuse, including wage theft, trafficking, forced labor, and denial of legal protections. The UAE’s kafala sponsorship system binds migrant workers to their employers, restricting movement and access to justice. Despite these realities, the Indonesian government’s ability to advocate effectively for its citizens abroad is hampered by geopolitical calculations and the importance of remittances to the country’s economy. The plight of these workers should be a rallying point for Indonesia to demand reform and human rights, underscoring that the exploitation of its people abroad is inextricably linked to authoritarian capital flows at home.
Beyond economic influence, the UAE deploys cultural and religious soft power to underpin its position in Indonesia. By funding Islamic universities, pesantren, and religious organizations that propagate a “quietist” interpretation of Islam aligned with authoritarian monarchism, the UAE seeks to shape religious discourse and marginalize more politically engaged or dissenting voices. These investments extend to media partnerships and “anti-extremism” programs that promote narratives consonant with UAE foreign policy interests, including silencing criticism of its normalization of relations with Israel. Such actions conflict profoundly with Indonesia’s vibrant pluralistic traditions and its solidarity with Palestinian struggles, representing a troubling political manipulation of Islam to quash democratic activism and dissent.
Indonesia’s historical commitment to justice, democracy, and independence—the foundational ideals enshrined in its constitution and social fabric—must not be sacrificed at the altar of petrodollar investment and authoritarian geopolitics. The UAE’s growing footprint threatens these core principles by embedding a system that privileges secrecy, elite enrichment, and control over participatory governance and equitable development. This undercuts Indonesia’s sovereignty, leaving it vulnerable to foreign economic domination and policy capture. The erosion of regulatory oversight, environmental protections, and labor rights is not merely economic mismanagement but a fundamental political crisis demanding urgent redress.
Resisting these authoritarian capital incursions requires coordinated and sustained action across multiple fronts. Indonesian civil society, labor movements, indigenous networks, environmental activists, religious organizations, academia, and youth must unite in a broad coalition to demand transparency, accountability, and justice. Parliamentary bodies should be empowered and compelled to scrutinize all UAE-linked deals rigorously, ensuring that contracts are publicly disclosed, environmental and social impact assessments conducted, and community consent secured. Independent institutions must safeguard human and labor rights, while the media should investigate and expose abuses connected to foreign investments.
Public campaigns that call for boycotts of Emirati-owned or affiliated companies operating in Indonesia—particularly in real estate, tourism, and retail—can create economic pressure for reform. At the same time, strengthening local industries and promoting community-led sustainable development models build resilience against exploitative external influence. Solidarity with the Indonesian migrant workforce abroad is equally vital, requiring diplomatic lobbying for fair labor agreements and international cooperation to abolish exploitative labor systems like kafala.
On the international stage, Indonesia must advocate within ASEAN, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the United Nations to hold foreign actors accountable for human rights violations and environmental degradation, seeking to align development finance with ethical and democratic principles. Global investor networks, human rights watchdogs, and environmental groups can be allies in pressing the UAE to reform its practices or face financial and reputational consequences.
Rejecting authoritarian capital is not a call for economic isolationism but an affirmation of sovereignty balanced with openness rooted in justice. Indonesia’s future depends on nurturing a developmental path that honors the dignity of its people, protects its natural heritage, and upholds its constitutional commitment to democracy and equality. It means reclaiming governance from the shadows cast by unchecked foreign oligarchs and envisioning an inclusive economy where wealth is shared, voices are heard, and rights defended.
The resilience of the Indonesian people, forged through historical struggles against colonialism, dictatorship, and injustice, remains the nation’s greatest hope. It is a wellspring of courage and vision that can confront the daunting challenges of authoritarian economic incursion today. Indonesia must lead as a beacon for the Muslim world—standing firmly for justice, sovereignty, and solidarity, choosing truth over tokenism, and people over profit. The time to act is now.
No data availble
2026 All Rights Reserved © International Boycott UAE Campaign